70 years ago, an Anglo-US coup condemned Iran to decades of oppression 鈥� but now the people are fighting back
,
The 1953 coup d'etat in Iran ushered in a period of exploitation and oppression that has continued 鈥� despite a subsequent revolution that led to huge changes 鈥� for 70 years. Each year on August 19, the anniversary of the coup, millions of Iranians ask themselves what would have happened if the US and UK had not conspired all those years ago to overthrow Iran鈥檚 democratically elected leader.
Iran, the Middle East and, arguably, the whole world may well have been profoundly different. Apart from rewriting the destiny of Iran and its neighbours, the coup paved the way for a series of imperialist interventions and the toppling of democratically elected governments across the global south. Perhaps Washington might have thought twice before plotting coups in , or , if they鈥檇 been unable to overthrow Iran鈥檚 prime minister, Mohammad Mosaddegh, so easily and profitably.
As the democratically elected leader of Iran from 1951 to 1953, Mosaddegh championed nationalisation of Iran鈥檚 oil industry. This had previously been in the hands of the 鈥� a British company, founded in 1909 after the discovery of a large oil field in Iran, which would later become BP.
In March 1951, Iran鈥檚 parliament . This caused consternation in the west 鈥� most notably in Britain, where the prospect of nationalisation was seen as potentially hugely damaging to the economy. Furthermore, it would have undermined Britain鈥檚 influence in the Middle East. Plotting to depose Mosaddegh began in earnest.
In the event, the coup 鈥� named 鈥� was a joint venture between the CIA and MI6. The shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who had recently fled the country after an earlier plot to remove Mossadegh had failed, returned to Iran.
Within a short period, he had tightened his grip on the country鈥檚 security services and imposed a dictatorial regime which ruled through brutality and fear. Pahlavi banned all opposition political parties, and many of the activists who participated in the movement for nationalisation of oil were arrested or fled the country.
Government by fear
In 1957, the shah established an internal security service, (Savak), which essentially ran Iran at the shah鈥檚 bidding. From then until 1975, only two major political parties were allowed to operate, the People鈥檚 Party (岣zb-e Mardom) and the New Iran Party (岣zb-e Iran-e Novin), and all parliamentary candidates had to be approved by Savak.
Both parties in reality were wholly under the shah鈥檚 control. The parliament only existed to rubber-stamp his decisions, as did the prime minister 鈥� who the shah appointed.
In 1975, the shah took his domination of Iranian politics further, , the Party of Resurrection of the Iranian Nation (Hezb-e Rastakhiz), which all Iranians were obliged to join. By 1979, when Iran , it was a virtual absolute monarchy, with the shah鈥檚 will enforced by the dreaded Savak secret police.
Within months of the revolution, though, Iran鈥檚 religious authorities took control under the leadership of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. The Islamic Republic quickly 鈥� Sazman-e Ettelaat Va Amniat Meli Iran 鈥� which used many of the same brutal methods as Savak.
鈥榃oman, Life, Freedom鈥�
This week, Iranians will recall the 1953 coup as they prepare protests ahead of the anniversary of the 鈥淲oman, Life, Freedom鈥� uprising. This movement began in September 2022 after the at the hands of the morality police 鈥� which enforcing the laws on Islamic dress code in public 鈥� for the 鈥渃rime鈥� of not wearing her hijab (headscarf) in the approved manner.
The resulting explosion of unrest has posed the most serious challenge to the Islamic Republic in its history. Although the state tried to from the beginning, the police brutality and the prospect of severe punishment, which included public executions and at the hands of the security forces.
At the same time as battling the oppression of their own state apparatus, ordinary Iranians are also suffering under the brutal US-imposed regime of sanctions. In the past five years, these sanctions 鈥� reimposed by Donald Trump after he unilaterally pulled the US out of the Iran Nuclear Deal, which had been signed by his predecessor Barack Obama in 2015 鈥� have devastated the Iranian economy. Soaring inflation and devaluation of the national currency have caused for ordinary Iranians.
As they , Iranians clearly grasp how, 70 years after the coup snuffed out their fledgling democracy, their internal struggles are still being influenced by foreign powers.
And they ask themselves if Mahsa Amini, and also and 鈥� two other women beaten to death by members of the state apparatus for protesting 鈥� as well as hundreds of other young Iranians, would still be paying with their lives in Iran鈥檚 struggle for basic rights today if the 1953 coup had not happened.
, Senior Lecturer in Sociology,
This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .